Tel: 011 646 4558 | Cell: 083 928 9484 | attorney@moni.co.za

To BEE or Not to BEE, that is the question in Solidarity obo Barnard v SAPS (165/2013) [2013] ZASCA 177

Is it an act of discrimination to refuse a person, of a certain race, a promotion when they are best suited for the position???

The facts:
Solidarity obo Barnard (who is a white female) argued that she was the best person for the job! This became common cause.
SAPS argued that Barnard’s position was not filled and therefore there was no discrimination. Further, that the position was not ‘critical’. However the post was re-advertised three times. On all three occasions Barnard was the best candidate over her colleagues who are black males.

The Supreme Court held:
If you are the best person for the position and not chosen then you have been discriminated against.

And further:
BEE is meant to be about employment equity and who is best suited to the job. It should not be about filling quotas and earning points. BEE was never meant to be about the ‘battle of the races’ for a particular job, it was designed to promote a more fair selection criteria when employing someone, however sadly it appears this is not always the case.

Download (pdf file)

Contact Us

Return to top

Your Labour Law specialist - Experience Empowerment ©

Twitter Linked In Facebook

Home    About Us    Read Us    Contact Us

PAIA Manual | BEE Verification | Copyright © 2009 - 2018 Moni Attorneys Incorporated & OJB Web Development | Photo credits: Gerry Pelser, iStock

Legal Notice: The information contained herein is provided for general information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Whilst we take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and integrity of information contained herein, we accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever if any information is, for whatever reason, incorrect or corrupted. We further accept no responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from reliance on information contained herein.